Another view on happYness
posted 2 years ago
A month ago, I’ve posted a new view on happYness in Plurk. It’s something like:
happYness has no “I”. Even if “I” am not happy, as long as “YOU” are happy, that’s what matters, that’s what’s important.
happYness has no “I”. It involves selflessness, self-sacrifice, and letting someone you love benefit from these.
I’ve thought of another one just yesterday:
happYness has no “I”. It’s “YOU” that is important, not “I”. “I” don’t matter at all. It’s what “YOU” do, think, and feel that’s important, not mine.
Am I defining things right? Or am I messed up? What’s happening? :-(
